The Social Hierarchy Of Julius Caesar - 863 Words

In every sense of life, there is a hierarchy. Every single being is constantly being compared to one another until either or comes out on top. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there is no denying the clear social hierarchy presented in the Roman Empire. Undoubtedly, the dictator of Rome, Julius Caesar, sits at the very top of the social hierarchy at this time. Similarly to Caesar, Jean-Paul Marat, a politician during the French Revolution of 1789, is also considered on the more elite half of the social hierarchy during that time. The social status’ of these two men didn’t make them any less susceptible to very real problems, including physical disabilities, murder and incontrol of what happens after death. No matter what a†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, Marat was stabbed only once by a woman named Charlotte Corday. In The Death Of Marat, a single puncture can be seen on his chest, with a scarce amount of blood running down his torso, not nea rly enough to be bathed in like Caesar was (David). Both of these men died at the hands of another human by the act of getting stabbed. After the murder of Caesar and Marat, the two would come to be portrayed in a certain manner. Because of their status, these portrayals had long lasting effects when compared to the death of someone lower in the social hierarchy. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus allows Marc Antony to speak on Caesars behalf in front of the citizens of Rome. Marc Antony says â€Å"He was my friend, faithful and just to me [...]When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept† (Shakespeare. III. ii. 85, 91). The word choice, such as â€Å"faithful† and â€Å"wept†, portray Caesar as kind and vulnerable. Antony also adds â€Å"Here is the will, and under Caesars seal./ To every Roman citizen he gives, /To every several man, seventy-five drachmas.† (Shakespeare III. ii. 240-243). After these statements made by Antony, the people of Rome see Caesar as a once worthy human being who cared about them. Marc Antony paints Caesar in a way that influences the Romans to mourn, in stead of celebrate, his death. This change of opinion causes the Romans to hate theShow MoreRelatedThe Assassination of Julius Caesar1325 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Roman Empire ruled with superiority and ruthlessness. The powerful Roman empire became a mirror of civilization of authority, strength to fear, dictatorship, and voraciousness. These powerful aristocrats were emperors, sat on the top of Rome’s social order, but many of these emperors abused their status and ability. Roman emperors’ history was all mixed ingredients of love, assassination, vengeance, terror, voracity, jealousy, and haughtiness. The first century AD of the Roman Empire became aRead MoreThe Manipulative Tactics Of Hitler And Mark Anthony1414 Words   |  6 Pageshistory, notorious world leaders have risen using manipulation. Hitler used manipulation to gain favor of citizens in Germany. Like Hitler, Mark Anthony manipulated Brutus to kill Julius Caesar on his way to the top. Hitler’s manipulation of the German people parallels that of Mark Anthony in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Manipulation is the influence cast among the victim that aims to change their views and attitudes (Schultz). The goal of the manipulator is to socially influence the victim. TheRead MoreJulius Caesar : A World s Most Influential And Powerful Military And Political Leaders1595 Words   |  7 PagesGaius Julius Caesar is considered to be one of the world’s most influential and powerful military and political leaders. Born into a wealthy and old aristocratic family on July 13 of the year 100, it was expected of Caesar to assume office in pursuit of an ordinary career in Roman politics. However, Caesar was not an ordinary person. Instead, he climbed up the political ladder by marrying into a wealthy family, assumed important military positions that heightened his status, and advocated for keyRead MoreRoman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic Essay900 Words   |  4 PagesThough the roman empire and the roman republic vary in their political structures they are quite common in the struc tures of their social hierarchy and reasoning for their downfalls. The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one yearRead MoreThe Classical Romans And The Roman Civilization1202 Words   |  5 Pagesknew that those things worked, but they were scared to try new things because they thought it wouldn’t work as good. The ancestors that were faithful to the society were supposed to give something back to society that they had learned. The social hierarchy was needed for fairness. Besides the king, the aristocrats were considered to be the highest. They were looked at as being very superior to everybody else and many people highly respected them. Aristocrats were very wealthy people who led andRead MoreThe Roman Republic And The Civil War2122 Words   |  9 Pageswar in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attemptRead MoreAssess The Causes And Consequences Of The Civil War2481 Words   |  10 Pageswar in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attemptRead MoreAnalysis Of Julius Caesar s The Tale Without Felling A Sense Of Reverence For The Man 2152 Words   |  9 Pagesâ€Å"VENI VIDI VICI,† or, â€Å"I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED.† These are probably some of the most ludicrous yet impressive words that can be articulated from the tongue. It is reassuring to note that undoubtedly these were the exact words uttered by Julius Caesar, for they seem to sum him up perfectly. Not only was he successful in conquering the ancient world, but his name resonated through the medieval and modern wor lds also, and has not failed to fascinate the one present today. Very few people can readRead MoreThe Romans Once Proud And Established Society Who Valued1300 Words   |  6 Pagesbody of old distinguished men who were members of Rome’s noble families (Backman, Cultures of the West, p.177). These offices were usually held for 1 year and a person would need to be re-elected (Backman, Cultures of the West, p.177). Roman social Hierarchy divided the factions into 3 groups the patricians- aristocrats who could trace their families back to the first senate, the equestrians- aristocrats of a lesser order who originated as the earlies roman Calvary, and the plebeians- all other freeRead MoreThe Effectiveness of Octavian in Enlisting Senatorial Support for his New Administration in the Period 30 to 19 BC.2342 Words   |  10 PagesGaius Octavius, a senator, but was the adopted son of Julius Caesar. Essentially Octavian, or Augustus as he became known as in 27BC, was a conservative republican. This is shown by Res Gestae Divi Augusti (literally the achievements of the Divine August) paragraph 8: I brought back into use many exemplary practises of our ancestors which were disappearing in our time. And also by Suetonius The Twelve Caesars, Augustus, chapter 93: Augustus showed great respect

Health Care System Should Be Legal - 1332 Words

Introduction The movement to allow registered nurses (RNs) to prescribe some medications has gained attention in the media recently. This involves administering or dispensing drugs to treat certain diseases, symptoms, and conditions. We believe that Ontario’s health care system should be changed to allow nurses to prescribe a limited list of medications, and this document is intended to help the general public to understand important points about this debate. There are several excellent reasons to support this idea, as well as significant concerns to be addressed. We will explain why this is important for the future of our healthcare system, offer arguments to support nurses prescribing, and discuss rational objections and restrictions†¦show more content†¦This authority would extend to two broad circumstances: working within a patient’s existing diagnoses, and in emergency situations to prevent delays in patient care or unnecessary hospitalization. For example, this would allow a nurse to help a patient who is experiencing side effects from a medication by changing to an alternate medication for the same problem; prescribe an anaesthetic cream for a patient who will clearly need stitches; or order insulin for a resident of a long-term care home who is known to have diabetes. Three Arguments Of course, neither convenience nor demand alone justify RNs prescribing as a safe and effective solution. In medicine, patient safety is the top priority, and delivering that safety consistently for the long term is an economic problem; if the system is not affordable, tomorrow’s patients will not receive the same level of care as today’s. Thus, as individuals and as a profession, nurses must be concerned with this issue. We have divided our arguments into three categories: efficiency, education, and economics. They are discussed separately here, but it is important to remember that they are all connected on many levels. Efficiency: Faster Service In many clinical settings the wait times tend to be longer than expected, and longer wait times for patients can lead to larger issues as well. A study conducted by White et al.

Corporate Social Responsibility for Practices- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theCorporate Social Responsibility for Practices. Answer: Introduction Business ethics is important in the society today because of the increase in market driven decisions. Organizations chose to act ethically through Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) as a way of bridging the gap between the profit agenda and community development. Although some organizations are sincere in the corporate social responsibility as a common good, others use this to advance their selfish agenda. In the global markets, the growth of Multi-National Enterprises (MNE) is cause for the emergence of CSR practices as a development agenda and PR strategy. MNE are multimillion-dollar operations operating across different borders. Due to the high profits, these organizations feel the need to give back to host country through community based initiatives. These could be investments in education, infrastructure, health care, or other basic services. Many countries such as the third world states continue to benefit from such functions. However, critiques of this venture highlight a falsified agenda claiming that MNEs are out to reap off and exploit the resources of the host country. Such theorists believe that CSR is a scheme used to gain operating license in foreign nations. This essay compares the pros and cons of CSR with reference to the global markets and emerging trends of globalization. Nature and Theory of Business Ethics Individual factors influence ethical and business decisions (Richardson and Ford, 2012). People make choices because of personal principles, educational background, professional convictions, and social cultural influences. Situations also determine the choices made. Business codes of conduct change leading to a shift in decisions. Gjolberg, (2009) describes the origin of CSR in the global arena to highlight the role of political and economic institutions in CSR decisions. She explains that organizations adopt CSR because they are willing and able to do it. National policies and activities of organizations may encourage or discourage a companys CSR. This implies that the national political and economic system causes MNEs to invest in CSR. The market economy or capitalist systems have a stiff competitive environment in which businesses formulate strategies in order to survive. The formulation of CSR involves theories and practices. Concepts in CSR date back to the industrial age as a S ocial Responsibility concept (Carroll, 1998). Its agenda was to create well-being in society and it came before the advent of corporate business. Its integration in organizations as a business strategy makes it part of business practices. Different organizations use CSR differently. For some, it is a policy but for other organizations, it is a strategic plan depending on whether the CSR has a managerial ownership or a public ownership (Siddiqui, Muttakin, and Khan, 2013). The legitimacy of a CSR practice depends on whether it abides by the national regulations. In most organizations today, business operations in the manufacturing and production industries have the responsibility of giving disclosure (Elliott, 2011). This is because of concerns for human existence and the quality of the natural environment in the present and future. National governments collaborate with global in ensuring that the international activities of innovation have sustainability approaches for the maintenance of environmental and resources base. This explains the call for standardized reporting of environmental effects such as carbon release as a CSR (Reber and Hou. 2011). Role of CSR in Influencing Corporate Actions and Attitudes Economic changes in the global system has led to an increase in capitalist organizations that have a profit focus. A Forbes report on the world largest corporations indicates that most of these are banks (Schaefer, 2016). It is unfair for such institutions to swim in a pool of profits when society is in poverty, poor climate and other social ills. It is ironical that most of these large banks are in China where there is a high record of negative climatic impact. Companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Samsung, Volkswagen and Toyota should invest some of its multibillion profits into development agenda. These decisions should be because of the conviction to redistribute some of its profits. It is unfair to make money from a society yet nothing goes back to the peoples lives. Consumers recognize and respect socially responsible brands. It is interesting that most brands, which top CSR trends, feature among the largest globally (Straus, 2016). CSR is an expensive venture, which needs funds, and these organizations have the funds required for large projects. Leaving all responsibilities to the humanitarian organizations is unfair and leaves humanity in suffering. CSR gives business organizations a management prerogative to offer accountability and operate responsibly (Leonidou, and Skarmeas, 2013). Unfortunately, CSR is no longer a charitable activity nor a sincere venture because of misconduct (Tonello, 2011). Companies use CSR for sustainability, business ethics, and competitive advantage. While ethics in business is good for stakeholder benefits it should not be a scapegoat for more reap offs. Consumers are also to blame because an organization, which engages in recognizable CSR, becomes more respectable. This is wrong if in essence, CSR makes the company even richer. A brand like Apple, which has high revenues, should worry more about giving back to the community than enhancing its brand equity (Woo, Kim, and Hur, 2014). The business function of CSR is questionable because the agenda is not to benefit the society but a selfish agenda. Using CSR for adverting or influencing the outcome is wrong (Hsu, 2012). Critical Analysis of Ethical Issues and Recommendations for Management Issues According to the International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility is serious responsibilities that are beyond profits (Gibson, 2013). When an organization invests millions to promote its own cause or to avert risks and crisis, it cannot claim to have done so on CSR grounds. CSR is a just cause for charity, philanthropic work. It could involve creation of employment for social good, community work, environmental practices and skill development. CSR should not find motivation in market driven cause but instead it should be part of the business ethics towards responsibility, poverty alleviation, non-renewable resource sustainability and social benefits. CSR practices such as sustainability approaches for environmental conservation are important. Reber and Hou (2011) highlight the importance of disclosure on environmental, organizational and community activities as a CSR activity. Hopkins Michael (2007) questions whether CSR is an answer to social problems such as po verty. He analyses CSR successes and failures by defining the development agenda. In his opinion, development should address issues such as inequality, urbanization, dualism, agricultural development, education, health, unemployment, governance, corruption, and basic needs among others (Hopkins: 2007: 2). CSR as a systems approach should have an approach similar to the NGOs in which operations contribute towards an agency charged with the role of development as a unified agenda of businesses. However, this is not the case because organizations pursue ways in which they can make more money through CSR strategic positioning. It is no wonder that MNE set aside billions with claims that this is a CSR initiative yet the reason for such an investment if organizational based. The origin of CSR is clear from the beginning. That is why it has a social concept intertwined. If the intention is not for social benefit, then it becomes a business responsibility. Conclusion CSR as a business ethics practice focuses on social responsibility in terms of community development and stakeholder benefits. It is suppose do improve people and society through improved standards of living. This means the presence of a global bank in an insecure zone such as the Middle East should invest some of its profits in improving security in the region. This is for the common good of the society and the sustainability of the business. Environmental concerns continue to overwhelm MNEs because of this. Therefore, instead of organizations adopting MNE plans as a strategy towards making their brands earn more money or reputation, it should do so a human responsibility. This ensures that corporations stay clear off then profit agenda, which can cause more harm than good. It is unethical to make profits. In fact, that is the sole motivation of any business. However, if a large organization is going to make money in the midst of massive unemployment, poor education systems and pove rty, then the business has no ethical reason for existence. The modern capitalist system comprises of stakeholders like suppliers, managers, investors, employees and external contributors. All these networks need to become part of the CSR plan. A concerted effort towards improving life will convince businesses on the importance of having a unified effort towards CSR charitable activities, developmental and sustainability plans. References Carroll, A. (1998). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In, Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Chapter 2. Oxford University Press, pp 19-46 Elliott, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-enabled Business Transformation. MIS Quarterly. Vol 35 (1), pp 197-236 Gibson, K (2013). Corporate Social responsibility. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley Gjolberg, M. (2009). The Origin of Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Forces or National Legacies. Socio-Economic Review. Vol 7 (4), pp 605-637) Hopkins, M. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Is Business the Solution? London. Michael Hopkins Hsu, K (2012). The Advertising Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Brand Equity: Evidence From the life Insurance Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics Leonidou, C and Skarmeas, D. (2013). When Consumers Doubt, Watch Out! The Role of CSR Skepticism. Journal of Business Research. Vol 6 (10), pp 1831-1838 Reber, B and Hou, J (2011). Dimensions of Disclosure: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting by Media Companies. Public Relations Review. Vol 37 (2), pp, 166-168 Schaefer, S. (2016). Worlds Largest Public Companies in 2016. Forbes. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2016/05/25/the-worlds-largest-companies-2016/#554bfb8445a6 (Accessed 23rd May 2017) Siddiqui, J, Muttakin, M and Khan, A. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol, 114 (2), pp, 207-223 Straus, K (2016). The Companies with the Best CSR Reputations in the World in 2016. Forbes. Available athttps://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2016/09/15/the-companies-with-the-best-csr-reputations-in-the-world-in-2016/#d06041275060 (Accessed 23rd 2017) Tonello, M (2011). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. Available at https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/06/26/the-business-case-for-corporate-social-responsibility/ (Accessed 23rd May 2017) Woo J, Kim, H, and Hur, W. (2014). How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol 25 (1), pp, 75-86