The Social Hierarchy Of Julius Caesar - 863 Words

In every sense of life, there is a hierarchy. Every single being is constantly being compared to one another until either or comes out on top. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there is no denying the clear social hierarchy presented in the Roman Empire. Undoubtedly, the dictator of Rome, Julius Caesar, sits at the very top of the social hierarchy at this time. Similarly to Caesar, Jean-Paul Marat, a politician during the French Revolution of 1789, is also considered on the more elite half of the social hierarchy during that time. The social status’ of these two men didn’t make them any less susceptible to very real problems, including physical disabilities, murder and incontrol of what happens after death. No matter what a†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, Marat was stabbed only once by a woman named Charlotte Corday. In The Death Of Marat, a single puncture can be seen on his chest, with a scarce amount of blood running down his torso, not nea rly enough to be bathed in like Caesar was (David). Both of these men died at the hands of another human by the act of getting stabbed. After the murder of Caesar and Marat, the two would come to be portrayed in a certain manner. Because of their status, these portrayals had long lasting effects when compared to the death of someone lower in the social hierarchy. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus allows Marc Antony to speak on Caesars behalf in front of the citizens of Rome. Marc Antony says â€Å"He was my friend, faithful and just to me [...]When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept† (Shakespeare. III. ii. 85, 91). The word choice, such as â€Å"faithful† and â€Å"wept†, portray Caesar as kind and vulnerable. Antony also adds â€Å"Here is the will, and under Caesars seal./ To every Roman citizen he gives, /To every several man, seventy-five drachmas.† (Shakespeare III. ii. 240-243). After these statements made by Antony, the people of Rome see Caesar as a once worthy human being who cared about them. Marc Antony paints Caesar in a way that influences the Romans to mourn, in stead of celebrate, his death. This change of opinion causes the Romans to hate theShow MoreRelatedThe Assassination of Julius Caesar1325 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Roman Empire ruled with superiority and ruthlessness. The powerful Roman empire became a mirror of civilization of authority, strength to fear, dictatorship, and voraciousness. These powerful aristocrats were emperors, sat on the top of Rome’s social order, but many of these emperors abused their status and ability. Roman emperors’ history was all mixed ingredients of love, assassination, vengeance, terror, voracity, jealousy, and haughtiness. The first century AD of the Roman Empire became aRead MoreThe Manipulative Tactics Of Hitler And Mark Anthony1414 Words   |  6 Pageshistory, notorious world leaders have risen using manipulation. Hitler used manipulation to gain favor of citizens in Germany. Like Hitler, Mark Anthony manipulated Brutus to kill Julius Caesar on his way to the top. Hitler’s manipulation of the German people parallels that of Mark Anthony in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Manipulation is the influence cast among the victim that aims to change their views and attitudes (Schultz). The goal of the manipulator is to socially influence the victim. TheRead MoreJulius Caesar : A World s Most Influential And Powerful Military And Political Leaders1595 Words   |  7 PagesGaius Julius Caesar is considered to be one of the world’s most influential and powerful military and political leaders. Born into a wealthy and old aristocratic family on July 13 of the year 100, it was expected of Caesar to assume office in pursuit of an ordinary career in Roman politics. However, Caesar was not an ordinary person. Instead, he climbed up the political ladder by marrying into a wealthy family, assumed important military positions that heightened his status, and advocated for keyRead MoreRoman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic Essay900 Words   |  4 PagesThough the roman empire and the roman republic vary in their political structures they are quite common in the struc tures of their social hierarchy and reasoning for their downfalls. The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one yearRead MoreThe Classical Romans And The Roman Civilization1202 Words   |  5 Pagesknew that those things worked, but they were scared to try new things because they thought it wouldn’t work as good. The ancestors that were faithful to the society were supposed to give something back to society that they had learned. The social hierarchy was needed for fairness. Besides the king, the aristocrats were considered to be the highest. They were looked at as being very superior to everybody else and many people highly respected them. Aristocrats were very wealthy people who led andRead MoreThe Roman Republic And The Civil War2122 Words   |  9 Pageswar in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attemptRead MoreAssess The Causes And Consequences Of The Civil War2481 Words   |  10 Pageswar in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attemptRead MoreAnalysis Of Julius Caesar s The Tale Without Felling A Sense Of Reverence For The Man 2152 Words   |  9 Pagesâ€Å"VENI VIDI VICI,† or, â€Å"I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED.† These are probably some of the most ludicrous yet impressive words that can be articulated from the tongue. It is reassuring to note that undoubtedly these were the exact words uttered by Julius Caesar, for they seem to sum him up perfectly. Not only was he successful in conquering the ancient world, but his name resonated through the medieval and modern wor lds also, and has not failed to fascinate the one present today. Very few people can readRead MoreThe Romans Once Proud And Established Society Who Valued1300 Words   |  6 Pagesbody of old distinguished men who were members of Rome’s noble families (Backman, Cultures of the West, p.177). These offices were usually held for 1 year and a person would need to be re-elected (Backman, Cultures of the West, p.177). Roman social Hierarchy divided the factions into 3 groups the patricians- aristocrats who could trace their families back to the first senate, the equestrians- aristocrats of a lesser order who originated as the earlies roman Calvary, and the plebeians- all other freeRead MoreThe Effectiveness of Octavian in Enlisting Senatorial Support for his New Administration in the Period 30 to 19 BC.2342 Words   |  10 PagesGaius Octavius, a senator, but was the adopted son of Julius Caesar. Essentially Octavian, or Augustus as he became known as in 27BC, was a conservative republican. This is shown by Res Gestae Divi Augusti (literally the achievements of the Divine August) paragraph 8: I brought back into use many exemplary practises of our ancestors which were disappearing in our time. And also by Suetonius The Twelve Caesars, Augustus, chapter 93: Augustus showed great respect